Thursday, June 6, 2013

Muslim Texts from 622 - 691 CE / 1 - 72 AH

Click here to LIKE this Blog on Face book.
---
Dated Muslim Texts From 1-72 AH / 622-691 CE: 
Documentary Evidence For Early Islam
M S M Saifullah & ʿAbdullah David
© Islamic Awareness, All Rights Reserved.
First Composed: 7th January 2007
Last Modified: 15th April 2013

Assalamu ʿalaykum wa rahamatullahi wa barakatuhu:
1. Introduction
A host of recent publications have challenged the traditional view of the development of Islam. For example, Christoph Luxenberg has attempted to show that the Qur'an was drafted in a mixed Aramaic-Arabic tongue and based upon Christian Aramaic texts, contrary to the traditional view of its composition in Arabic or derived from Arabian religious traditions.[1] On the other hand, Yehuda Nevo argued that the religious beliefs of the early Arabs constituted paganism along with 'a very simple form of monotheism with Judaeo-Christian overtones'.[2] There is no doubt that the study of early Islamic history is contentious among the Western scholars,[3] where agreement about various issues is quite rare. In this kind of a situation, one might expect that the existing documents such as papyri, coins and inscriptions will be taken into account while formulating a hypothesis. Unfortunately, such has not been the case and the result of which is often the proposal of extravagant hypotheses on the origins of Islam.[4] What makes this situation particularly bizarre is that the Western scholars have access to what can be called a treasure-trove of documentary evidence when compared with other major world religions. Judaeo-Christian scholars studying the earliest Christian artefacts are presently unable to call forward even a single item of documentary evidence from the first one hundred years of Christianity and beyond.[5]
Our aim here is quite modest. It is to simply present the corpus of dated Muslim writings along with their contents from 1-72 AH / 622-691 CE. These writings include inscriptionscoins and papyri. By just going through their content, the reader would be able to establish certain landmarks and conclusions. Why the date 72 AH? This is because when we come to the Marwanid period, the dated Islamic texts become much more numerous and with varied content. After this period the citations from the Qur'an also begin to appear.
The list below is based on Robert Hoyland's collection[6] with some additions from our side.
List Of Dated Muslim Texts From 1-72 AH / 622-691 CE

 Various demand notices and receipts on papyri (in Greek and Arabic or Greek only), Egypt, 22 AH / December 642 CE onwards.
Opening formulae: bism Allāh / en onomati tou theou ("In the name of God"); bism Allāh al-raḥmān al-raḥīm. ("In the name of Allāh, the Compassionate, the Merciful"); syn theō ("With God").
Papyri ERF No. 552, containing an acknowledgement for receipt of six nomismata by ʿUbayd ibn ʿUmar, concludes kai eirēnē soi apo theou ("And the peace from God be upon you"). Papyri ERF Nos. 552-573 are dated between 22 AH and 57 AH (except for 572, which may be later). For Papyri ERF 558, click here.
Kataba salmah thalāthah wa-ʿishrīn.
Salmah wrote in twenty-three.
Bism Allāh anā Zuhayr katabt zaman tuwuffiya ʿUmar sanat arbaʿ wa-ʿishrīn
In the name of God, I Zuhayr wrote [this] at the time ʿUmar died in the year twenty-four.
Taraḥḥama Allāh ʿalam Yazīd ibn ʿAbdallāh al-Salūlī wa-kataba fi Jumādā [kadhā] min sanat saba‘ wa-‘ishrīn.
May God have mercy on Yazīd ibn ʿAbdallāh al-Salūlī and he wrote [this] in Jumādā of the year twenty-seven.
Bism Allāh al-raḥmān al-raḥīm. hadhā l-qabr li-ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Ibn Khair al-Ḥajrī. Allahumma ighfir lahu wadkhulhi fī raḥma minka wa ātinā ma‘ahu. istaghfir lahu idhā qara’a hādha l-kitāb wa-qul amīn. wa-kutiba hādha l-kitāb fī Jumādā al-ākhar min sanat iḥdā wa-thalāthin.
In the name of Allāh, the Compassionate, the Merciful; this tomb belongs to ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Ibn Khair al-Ḥajrī. O Allāh, forgive him and make him enter into Thy mercy and make us go with him. (passer by) When reading this inscription ask pardon for him (the deceased) and say Amen! This inscription was written in Jumādā II of the year thirty-one.
All bear the legend bism Allāh ("In the name of God"), sometimes with additional words in Arabic and Persians.
All bear the legend lillāh ("Unto God").
Raḥmat Allāh wa barakatuhu ʿalā ʿAbd al-Raḥmān bin Khālid bin al-ʿĀs wa kutiba li-sanat arba‘īn.
Allah's mercy and blessing be upon ʿAbd al-Raḥmān bin Khālid bin al-ʿĀs, and written in the year forty.
 Arabic tax demand notice (entagion) on marble, Andarin, northern Syria, from the time of Muʿāwiya (40–60 AH / 661–80 CE).
Bism Allāh al-raḥmān al-raḥīm min al-Layth bin al-Diyāl ʿāmil al-amīr Muʿāwiya... ʿalā ard Qinnasrīn wa-ahlihi. takfi mukūs min iqlīm...
In the name of God the Compassionate, the Merciful: from al-Layth ibn al-Diyāl agent of the amīr Muʿāwiya ... over Qinnasrin and its people. You should meet in full the taxes of the district of...
Bism Allāh al-raḥmān al-raḥīm hadhā l-sadd li-ʿabd Allāh Muʿāwiya [kadham] amīr al-mu’minīn Allāhumma baraka [kadhā] lahu fihi rabb alsamawat [kadhā] wa-l-ard banahu [kadhā] Abū Raddād mawlā ʿAbdallāh ibn ʿAbbās bi-ḥawl Allāh wa-quwwatihi wa-qāma ʿalayhi Kathīr ibn al-Ṣalt wa-Abū Mūsā.
In the name of God the Compassionate the Merciful, this dam is on behalf of the servant of God Muʿāwiya commander of the believers. O God, bless him for it, Lord of the heavens and the earth. Abū Raddād client of ʿAbdallāh ibn ʿAbbās built it by the power and strength of God, and Kathīr ibn al-Ṣalt and Abū Mūsā oversaw it.
Greek: abdella Mouaouia amilalmoumnin
Arabic: ʿabd Allāh Muʿāwiya amīr al-mu’minīn
On the obverse is written in Persian Maawia amir i-wruishnikan ("Muʿāwiya, commander of the faithful"), and in Arabic bism Allāh ("In the name of God").
The dating formula is sanat qadā’ al-mu’minīn ("the year of the dispensation of the believers").
In the days of the servant of God Muʿāwiya, the commander of the faithful (abdalla Maavia amēra almoumenēn), the hot baths of the people there were saved and rebuilt by ʿAbd Allāh son of Abū Hāshim, the governor (Abouasemou symboulou), on the fifth of the month of December, on the second day (of the week), in the 6th year of the indiction, in the year 726 of the colony, according to the arabs (kata Arabas) the 42nd year, for the healing of the sick, under the care of Ioannes, the official of Gadara.
I, Philotheos the ape (village headman, protokometes), son of the late Houri, the man from Tjinela, swear by God Almighty and the well-being of ʿAmr not to have left out any man in our whole village from fourteen years (up) but to have accounted for him to your lordship. I, Ioustos, the komogrammateus (village scribe), swear by God Almighty and the well-being of ‘Amr not to have left out any man in our whole village but to have accounted for him to your lordship.
I, Philotheos, together with Esaias, the apes, and together with Apater the priest, the men from the village of Tjinela, we write, swearing by the name of God and the well-being of ʿAmr not to have left out any man in our village from fourteen years on; if you produce any we have left behind we will put them in our house. Sign of Philotheos the protokometes, he agrees. Sign of Esaias, he agrees. Apater, the humble priest, I agree.
Among those things ordered by the Commander of the Faithful Muʿāwiya to dismiss the amīr ʿAbd Allāh bin Amīr from the rule of al-Baṣra.
All bear the legend bism Allāh al-malik ("In the name of God, the King").
All bear the legend bism Allāh rabbī ("In the name of God, my Lord"), sometimes with additional words in Arabic and Persian.
Allahumma ighfir li-ʿAbd Allāh ibn Dayrām kutiba li-ʿarbaʿa layāl khalūn min Muḥarram min sanat sitt wa-arba‘īn.
O Allah grant pardon to ʿAbdalllāh bin Dayrām written when four nights had passed of [the month of] Muḥarram of the year forty-six.
 Seven bilingual entagia, Nessana, 54-57 AH / 674-77 CE. Click here to view one of them.
All begin Bism Allāh al-raḥmān al-raḥīm ("In the name of Allāh, the Compassionate, the Merciful").
All bear the legend: Bism Allāh rabb al-ḥukm ("In the name of God, the Lord of judgement").
Allāhumma ighfir li-Hadya ibn Alī ibn Hinayda wa-kutiba li-sanat ithnān wa-khamsīn.
O God, forgive Hadya ibn Alī ibn Hinayda, written in the year fifty-two.
The dating formula is sanat qadā’ al-mu’minīn ("the year of the dispensation of the believers").
Hadhā l-sadd li-ʿabd Allāh Muʿāwiya amīr al-mu’minīn banahuʿAbd Allāh ibn Ṣakhr bidhn Allāh li-sanat thaman wa khamsīn. Allahumma ighfir li-ʿabd Allāh Muʿāwiya amīr al-mu’minīn wa-thabbithu w-unṣurhu wa mattiʿ l-mu’minīn bihi. katabaʿAmr ibn Ḥabbāb.
This dam [belongs] to servant of God Muʿāwiya, commander of the believers. ʿAbdullāh b. Ṣakhr built it with the permission of Allāh, in the year fifty-eight. O Allāh, pardon servant of God Muʿāwiya, commander of the believers, and strengthen him, and make him victorious, and grant the commander of the believers the enjoyment of it. ʿAmr b. Habbāb wrote [it].
Obverse has the standard profile of Khusrau II and bears his name; reversal has usual Sassanian iconography (fire altar, stars and crescents etc.), but in the margin is written in Persian "Year one of Yazīd".
Bism Allāh al-raḥmān al-raḥīm. Allāh wa-kabbir kabīran wa-l-ḥamd lillāh kathīran. wa subḥān Allāh bukratan wa-asīlan wa-laylan tawīlan Allahumma rabb Jibrīl wa-Mīkā’īl wa Isrāfīl ighfir li-? ibn Yazīd al-As‘adī mā taqaddama min dhanbihi wa-mā ta'akhkhara wa-li-man qāla amīn amīn rabb al-ʿālamīn. wa-ktbt hādha l-kitāb fī Shawwāl min sanat arbaʿwa-sittīn.
In the name of Allah, the Merciful, the Compassionate. Allah is the greatest Great. May Allah be abundantly thanked and May Allah be praised morning and evening. O Lord of Gabriel, Michael and Isrāfīl, forgive Layth (?) Ibn Yazid al-Asʿadi his early sins and the ones that followed and (forgive) whoever says AmīnAmīn, O Lord of the worlds. I wrote this inscription in (the month of)Shawwāl in the year sixty-four.
[ʿAbd] Allāh Marwān amīr al-mu’[min]īn mimmā amr.... fī ṭirāz ifrīqīyya.
[The servant of] God, Marwān, Commander of the Faithful. Of what was ordered... in the ṭirāz of Ifrīqīyya.
The legend is bism Allāh al-ʿazīz ("In the name of God, the Great").
The legend is bism Allāh Muḥammad rasūl Allāh ("In the name of God, Muḥammad is the Messenger of God").
 An Arab-Sassanian coin of Muṣʿab ibn al-Zubayr, Basra, 66 AH (?) / 685-86 CE.
The legend is muṣʿab ḥasbuhu Allāh ("Muṣʿab, God is his sufficiency").
 Bilingual Greek–Arabic papyrus, release from labour contact, from Nessana, southern Palestine, 67 AH / 687 CE.
Payment of money to release person from employ of al-Aswad ibn ʿAdī, who then returned part of the payment as alms: ṣadaqa ʿalayhi bi echarisato.
All have the legend lillāh al-ḥamd ("Unto God be praise").
Hādhihi l-qantara amara bihā ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ibn Marwān al-amīr. Allahumma bārik lahu fī amrihi kullihi wa-thabbit sultānahu ‘alā mā tardā wa-aqarra ‘aynahu fī nafsihi wa-ḥashamihi amīn. wa-qāma bi-binā'ihā Saʿd Abū ʿUthmān wa-kataba ‘Abd al-Raḥmān fī Ṣafar sanat tisʿ wa sittīn.
This bridge was commissioned by the governor ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ibn Marwān. O God, bless him in his affairs, strengthen his rule as You see fit and cheer him himself and his entourage, amīn. Saʿd Abū ʿUthmān undertook the building of it, and ʿAbd al-Raḥmān wrote [this] in Ṣafar of the year sixty-nine.
mimmā ʿumila bi-l-Baṣra sanat tisaʿ wa sittīn barakah min sanʿah ibn Yazīd.
Made in Basra in year sixty-nine, "barakah", crafted by Ibn Yazīd.
 An Arab-Sassanian coin of the Kharijite rebel Qatarī ibn al-Fujāʾa, Bīshāpūr, 69 AH / 688-89 CE. A coin of Qatarī ibn al-Fujāʾa from 75 AH / 694-695 CE is shown here.
It bears the typically Kharijite slogan lā ḥukm illā lillāh ("Judgement belongs to God alone"), prefixed with bism Allāh. And written in Persian: "Servant of God, Ktri, commander of the faithful".
Obverse field: The legend in Middle Persian reads MHMT PGTAMI Y DAT ("Muḥammad is the Messenger of God"). Obverse margin: bism Allāh walī / al-Amr ("In the name of God, the Master / of affairs").
 An Arab-Sassanian coin of the Umayyad governer of Basra Khālid ibn ‘Abd Allāh, Bīshāpūr, 71 AH / 690-91 CE.
The legend is bism Allāh Muḥammad rasūl Allāh ("In the name of God, Muḥammad is the messenger of God").
In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate. The greatest calamity of the people of Islām (ahl al-Islām) is that which has fallen them on the death of Muḥammad the Prophet; may God grant him peace. This is the tomb of ʿAbāssa daughter of Juraij (?), son of (?). May clemency, forgiveness and satisfaction of God be on her. She died on Monday, fourteen days having elapsed from Dhul-Qaʿdah of the year seventy-one, confessing that there is no god but God alone without partner and that Muḥammad is His servant and His apostle, may God grant him peace.
Bookmark and Share

References
[1] C. Luxenberg, Die syro-aramäische Lesart des Koran: Ein Beitrag zur Entschlüsselung der Koransprache, 2000, Das Arabische Book: Berlin.
[2] Y. Nevo & J. Koren, Crossroads To Islam: The Origins Of The Arab Religion And The Arab State, 2003, Prometheus Books: New York, pp. 10-11. Also see their earlier works Y. D. Nevo, "Towards A Prehistory Of Islam", Jerusalem Studies In Arabic And Islam, 1994, Volume 17, pp. 108-141; J. Koren & Y. Nevo, "Methodological Approaches To Islamic Studies", 1991, Der Islam, Volume 68, pp. 87-107.
[3] The most commonly quoted controversial Western scholars who attempted to reconstruct the early Islamic history are Patricia Crone and Michael Cook (Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World, 1977, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge) and John Wansbrough (Qur’anic Studies: Sources & Methods Of Scriptural Interpretation, 1977, Oxford University Press; idem., The Sectarian Milieu: Content & Composition Of Islamic Salvation History, 1978, Oxford University Press).
[4] Even those sober publications which do make extensive use of the early dated corpus of evidence can inadvertently ignore some vital pieces of evidence. For example, whilst commending Beatrice Gruendler’s thorough use of the early dated Arabic texts in her volume The Development Of The Arabic Scripts: From The Nabatean Era To The First Islamic Century According To Dated Texts[1993, Harvard Semitic Series No. 43, Scholars Press: Atlanta (GA)], Healey and Rex-Smith note that vital pieces of paleographic evidence are still absent. Specifically, with regard to coins, glass weights and stamps they lament, “for how much longer will these essential pieces of palaeographic evidence be forgotten?” See J. F. Healey and G. Rex-Smith, "Beatrice Gruendler, The Development Of The Arabic Scripts: From The Nabatean Era To The First Islamic Century According To Dated Texts", Journal Of Semitic Studies, 1995, Volume XL, No. 1, p. 177.
[5] L. W. Hurtado, The Earliest Christian Artifacts: Manuscripts And Christian Origins, 2006, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.: Grand Rapids (MI), pp. 2-4. The earliest extant Christian inscriptions are from the third century CE. The earliest extant example of a Christian Church is from the third century CE. Hurtado says [p. 3]:
… Among these pre-Constantinian manuscripts, a small but growing number are dated as early as the second century, and these second-century manuscripts now constitute the earliest extant artifacts of Christianity.
[6] R. Hoyland, Seeing Islam As Others Saw It: A Survey And Evaluation Of Christian, Jewish And Zoroastrian Writings On Early Islam, 1997, Studies in Late Antiquity and Early Islam - 13, The Darwin Press, Inc.: Princeton (NJ), pp. 688-695; More recently, he has added some more sources to this corpus, see R. Hoyland, "New Documentary Texts And The Early Islamic State", Bulletin Of The School Of Oriental And African Studies, 2006, Volume 69, No. 3, pp. 411-416.

http://www.islamic-awareness.org/History/Islam/Inscriptions/earlyislam.html

Thursday, May 2, 2013

World’s Muslims: Religion, Politics and Society

Click here to LIKE this Blog on Face book.
---
PEWResearchCenter
POLL April 30, 2013
Chapter 2: Religion and Politics


Muslims around the world express broad support for democracy and for people of other faiths being able to practice their religion freely. At the same time, many Muslims say religious leaders should influence political matters and see Islamic political parties as just as good or better than other political parties.
Many Muslims express concern about religious extremist groups operating in their country. On balance, more Muslims are concerned about Islamic than Christian extremist groups. And while the vast majority of Muslims in most countries say suicide bombing is rarely or never justified to defend Islam against its enemies, substantial minorities in a few countries consider such violence justifiable in at least some circumstances.
Democracy 
gsi2-chp2-1
In 31 of the 37 countries where the question was asked at least half of Muslims believe a democratic government, rather than a leader with a strong hand, is best able to address their country’s problems.
Support for democracy tends to be highest among Muslims in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. In 12 of the 16 countries surveyed in sub-Saharan Africa, roughly two-thirds or more prefer a democratic government, including nearly nine-in-ten (87%) in Ghana. Fewer, though still a majority, prefer democracy over a strong leader in Guinea Bissau (61%), Niger (57%) and Tanzania (57%). In Southeast Asia, more than six-in-ten Muslims in Malaysia (67%), Thailand (64%) and Indonesia (61%) also prefer democracy.
In the Middle East and North Africa, at least three-quarters of Muslims support democracy in Lebanon (81%) and Tunisia (75%). At least half in Egypt (55%), the Palestinian territories (55%) and Iraq (54%) do so as well.
Attitudes vary somewhat in the other regions surveyed. In South Asia, the percentage of Muslims who say a democratic government is better able to solve their country’s problems ranges from 70% in Bangladesh to 29% in Pakistan. In Central Asia, at least half of Muslims in Tajikistan (76%), Turkey (67%), Kazakhstan (52%) and Azerbaijan (51%) prefer democracy over a leader with a strong hand, while far fewer in Kyrgyzstan (32%) say the same.
In Southern and Eastern Europe, support for democracy is much higher among Muslims in Kosovo (76%) and Albania (69%) than in Bosnia-Herzegovina (47%) and Russia (35%), where a majority of Muslims favor a powerful leader.
Views about the better type of government differ little by frequency of prayer, age, gender or education level.
Religious Freedom 
Muslims generally say they are very free to practice their religion. Most also believe non-Muslims in their country are very free to practice their faith. And among those who view non-Muslims as very free to practice their faith, the prevailing opinion is that this is a good thing.
gsi2-chp2-2
Muslims in Southeast Asia, South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa are particularly likely to say they are “very free” to practice their faith. Roughly seven-in-ten or more Muslims in each country surveyed in these regions hold this view.
gsi2-chp2-3
There is more variation in the Middle East-North Africa region, where Muslims in Iraq (48%) and Egypt (46%) are much less likely than Muslims in Lebanon (90%) and Morocco (88%) to believe they are able to practice Islam very freely. Muslims in Uzbekistan (39%) are the least likely among the Muslim populations surveyed to say they are very free to practice their faith.
In addition to freedom for themselves, most Muslims believe individuals from other religions are able to practice their faith openly. In 33 of the 38 countries where the question was asked at least half say people of other faiths are very free to practice their religion. (This question was not asked in Afghanistan.)
Muslims in Central Asia and the Middle East and North Africa are generally less likely to believe non-Muslims can practice their faith freely. Fewer than half in Kyrgyzstan (48%), Tajikistan (47%) and Uzbekistan (26%), for example, say others are able to practice their faith openly. Similarly, in the Middle East-North Africa region, fewer than four-in-ten Muslims in Iraq (37%) and Egypt (31%) believe non-Muslims are free to practice their religion.
In 15 of the countries surveyed, Muslims are significantly more likely to say they themselves are very free to practice their religion than to say the same about people of other faiths. The gaps are particularly wide in Jordan (-22 percentage points), Kyrgyzstan (-20), Turkey  (-20) and Egypt (-15).
Overall, Muslims broadly support the idea of religious freedom. Among Muslims who say people of different religions are very free to practice their faith, three-quarters or more in each country say this is a good thing.
Religious Leaders’ Role in Politics 
gsi2-chp2-4
Compared with support for democracy and religious freedom, sharper regional differences emerge over the question of the role of religious leaders in politics. The prevailing view among Muslims in Southeast Asia, South Asia and the Middle East-North Africa region is that religious leaders should have at least some influence in political matters. By contrast, this is the minority view in most of the countries surveyed in Central Asia and Southern and Eastern Europe. With the notable exception of Afghanistan, fewer than half of Muslims in any country surveyed say religious leaders should have a large influence in politics.
Support for religious leaders having a say in political matters is particularly high in Southeast Asia. At least three-quarters of Muslims in Malaysia (82%) and Indonesia (75%) believe religious leaders should influence political matters, including substantial percentages who say they should play a large role (41% and 30%, respectively).
In South Asia, a large majority in Afghanistan (82%) and Bangladesh (69%) believe religious leaders ought to influence political matters, while 54% of Pakistani Muslims agree. Afghan Muslims are the most likely among the populations surveyed to say religious leaders should have a large influence on politics (53%), while roughly a quarter of Muslims in Pakistan (27%) and Bangladesh (25%) express this view.
In the Middle East-North Africa region, a majority of Muslims in most countries surveyed say religious leaders should play a role in politics. Support is highest among Muslims in Jordan (80%), Egypt (75%) and the Palestinian territories (72%). Roughly six-in-ten in Tunisia (58%) and Iraq (57%) agree. Lebanese Muslims are significantly less supportive; 37% think religious leaders should have at least some role in political matters, while 62% disagree. In each country in the region except Lebanon, about a quarter or more say religious leaders should have a largeinfluence on politics, including 37% in Jordan.
gsi2-chp2-5
Muslims in Southern and Eastern Europe and Central Asia tend to be less supportive of a role for religious leaders in political matters. Only in Russia does a majority (58%) believe religious leaders should have at least some influence. Meanwhile, Muslims in Kyrgyzstan are divided over the issue (46% say religious leaders should have an influence on political matters, 51% disagree). In the other countries surveyed in these two regions, fewer than four-in-ten Muslims believe religious leaders should have a role in politics.
In some countries, Muslims who pray several times a day are more likely than those who pray less often to say religious leaders should influence political matters. The gap is particularly large in Lebanon, where 51% of Muslims who pray several times a day believe religious leaders should have at least some political influence, compared with 13% of those who pray less often.
Islamic Political Parties 
gsi2-chp2-6
In most countries where the question was asked at least half of Muslims rate Islamic parties as better than, or about the same, as other political parties.
The percentage of Muslims who say Islamic parties arebetter than other political parties is highest in Egypt (55%), Tunisia (55%) and Afghanistan (54%), although at least four-in-ten share this view in Jordan (46%), Malaysia (43%) and Bangladesh (41%). By contrast, fewer than a quarter of Muslims view Islamic parties more favorably than other parties in the Palestinian territories (21%), Kosovo (16%), Bosnia-Herzegovina (12%), Azerbaijan (11%) and Kazakhstan (9%).
In all countries where the question was asked, substantial percentages of Muslims rate Islamic parties as the same as other political parties, including at least half in Indonesia (57%) and Lebanon (51%). Elsewhere, at least one-in-five rate Islamic and other political parties the same.
Relatively few Muslims consider Islamic parties to be worse than other political parties. Only in the Palestinian territories (29%), Azerbaijan (27%) and Turkey (26%) do more than a quarter subscribe to this view.
In many countries, favorable assessments of Islamic political parties track with support for religious leaders having an influence on politics. In Lebanon, for example, Muslims who say religious leaders should have at least some political influence are 53 percentage points more likely than those who disagree to say Islamic parties are better (63% vs. 10%). In 15 of the other countries surveyed, similar double-digit gaps emerge over the question of Islamic parties, with those who support a role for religious leaders in politics consistently more favorable toward Islamic political parties.
gsi2-chp2-7
Views on the role of religion in politics may not be the only factor affecting attitudes toward Islamic parties. Local political circumstances may also influence opinions on this question. Both Tunisia and Egypt, for example, experienced major political upheavals in 2011, with Islamic parties emerging as the dominant political blocs. At the time of the surveys in Tunisia and Egypt, Muslims who said they were satisfied with the direction of the country were significantly more likely than those who were dissatisfied to say Islamic political parties are better than other political parties (+24 percentage points in Tunisia and +11 in Egypt).20 
Concern About Religious Extremism 
gsi2-chp2-8
At least half of Muslims in 22 of the 36 countries where the question was asked say they are at least somewhat concerned about religious extremist groups in their country. In most countries, Muslims are much more worried about Islamic extremists than Christian extremists. Substantial proportions in some countries, including countries surveyed in the Middle East and North Africa, express concern about both Muslim and Christian extremist groups.
The survey finds widespread concern about religious extremism in Southeast Asia, South Asia and the Middle East-North Africa region. In nearly every country surveyed in these regions, at least half of Muslims say they are very concerned or somewhat concerned about extremist groups. In Indonesia, nearly eight-in-ten Muslims say they are worried about religious extremism (78%), including more than half (53%) who are worried about Islamic extremists. In Malaysia, too, a majority of Muslims (63%) are worried about extremist groups; however, more Malaysian Muslims express concerns about Christian than Muslim groups (31% vs. 8%). In the Middle East-North Africa region, on balance, Muslims are more concerned about Islamic than Christian extremist groups, but more than one-in-five in most countries surveyed in the region are worried about both Islamic and Christian groups.
At least half in nine of the 16 countries surveyed in sub-Saharan Africa also say they are concerned about religious extremism. And in most countries, Islamic extremism rather than Christian extremism is the principal worry. For example, in Guinea Bissau, more than half of Muslims (54%) say they are at least somewhat concerned about Islamic extremist groups; in Ghana 45% say the same, as do roughly a third of Muslims in Djibouti (36%), Chad (33%), Kenya (33%) and Niger (32%).
In Southern and Eastern Europe, worries about religious extremism are most widespread in Bosnia-Herzegovina, where more than six-in-ten (63%) are at least somewhat concerned about religious extremist groups, including 27% who are specifically concerned about Islamic extremists. A similar proportion of Muslims (30%) in Bosnia-Herzegovina are worried about both Muslim and Christian groups in the country. Fewer than half say they are very or somewhat concerned about religious extremist groups in Russia (46%), Kosovo (45%) and Albania (21%).
In Central Asia, the percentage of Muslims concerned about religious extremism ranges from roughly six-in-ten in Kazakhstan (63%) and Kyrgyzstan (62%) to fewer than one-in-ten in Azerbaijan (6%). In most of the countries surveyed in the region, worries about Islamic extremists are more common than are concerns about Christian extremists, although one-in-five in Kyrgyzstan are concerned about extremists of both faiths.
Suicide Bombing 
gsi2-chp2-9
In most of the 21 countries where the question was asked few Muslims endorse suicide bombing and other forms of violence against civilian targets as a means of defending Islam against its enemies. But in a few countries, substantial minorities believe suicide bombing can be often justified or sometimes justified.  
Muslims in some countries surveyed in South Asia and the Middle East-North Africa region are more likely than Muslims elsewhere to consider suicide bombing justified. Four-in-ten Palestinian Muslims see suicide bombing as often or sometimes justified, while roughly half (49%) take the opposite view. In Egypt, about three-in-ten (29%) consider suicide bombing justified at least sometimes. Elsewhere in the region, fewer Muslims believe such violence is often or sometimes justified, including fewer than one-in-five in Jordan (15%) and about one-in-ten in Tunisia (12%), Morocco (9%) and Iraq (7%).
In Afghanistan, a substantial minority of Muslims (39%) say that this form of violence against civilian targets is often or sometimes justifiable in defense of Islam. In Bangladesh, more than a quarter of Muslims (26%) take this view. Support for suicide bombing is lower in Pakistan (13%).
In the countries surveyed in Central Asia and Southern and Eastern Europe, fewer than one-in-six Muslims consider suicide bombing justified in Turkey (15%), Kosovo (11%) and Kyrgyzstan (10%). Elsewhere in these two regions, even fewer say this tactic can be justified.
In Southeast Asia, Malaysian Muslims are more likely than Indonesian Muslims to consider suicide bombing justifiable (18% vs. 7%).

Footnotes:  
20 The survey in Egypt was conducted Nov. 14-Dec. 18, 2011. Parliamentary elections were held in November 2011 through January 2012, and the Islamist Freedom and Justice Party was declared the winner of a plurality of seats in January 2012. The survey in Tunisia was conducted Nov. 10-Dec. 7, 2011. The Islamist party Ennahda won a plurality of seats in the Constituent Assembly elections in October 2011, and the Constituent Assembly met for the first time in November 2011. (return to text) 
Photo Credit: © Scott E Barbour
http://www.pewforum.org/Muslim/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-exec.aspx

---

Note:
If you wish to send me a “private” message, please click here Facebook.

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Ethics in Islam

Click here to LIKE this Blog on Face book.
---

By Shaykh Ali Gomaa


Akhlaq: Ethical Theory in Islam

Islam has the unique capacity to transform its various theological tenets and values into practical and moral principles. In fact, the Islamic Shariah was specifically established with an eye to instilling gracious behavior and lofty morals among its adherents and to refine their characters, all of which contributes to general well being among people and throughout the land.

These goals are aimed at guaranteeing a safe and peaceful existence for each person and protecting all aspects of the lives of individuals, whether in the arena of beliefs, wealth, honor, or peace of mind.
According to Islam, human well being begins and ends with manners and morals. It begins with the call for people to accept guidance and righteousness and culminates in producing behaviors among human beings indicative of humanity, nobility, and love.

Islam has set down laws and rules which, by their nature, serve to ensure the establishment of good morals and manners within Islamic society, whether at the level of individuals as they deal with one another or at the level of societies in the greater world. These rules ensure the survival and protection of Islam’s ethical structure, thus allowing human beings to live among one another on the basis of peace and mutual cooperation.

There are regulations governing the poor due, charity, pledges, expiations, and financial guarantees as well as rules touching upon joint responsibilities necessary to the preservation of a stable society among Muslims. There are rules regarding the punishment of criminals, traitors, killers, and adulterers due to the fact that their disregard for moral values poses a threat to the group and transgresses against society and its integrity. It is necessary to treat such offenders harshly in order to guarantee a safe and peaceful society.


The concept of akhlaq

The famous ethicist Ibn Miskawayh defines character (khuluq, pl. akhlaq) as “a state of the soul which moves it toward action without any need for reflection or deliberation. This state can be divided into two: The first is that which is natural, and is a part of one’s true disposition, such as a human who laughs excessively at any small thing that amuses him, or feels sadness and sorrow in response to any small matter that afflicts him. The second is that which is borne of training and habituation, and though it may originally be a product of reflection and deliberation eventually becomes a character trait.”

The Shaykh Abu Hamid al-Ghazali says, “Character is a term for a firmly entrenched form in the soul from which actions emanate with ease and facility, without need for reflection or deliberation. Inasmuch as this form in the soul produces beautiful and praiseworthy actions by the measures of reason and the shari’a, it is called a good character; and inasmuch as it produces repugnant actions, it is called a bad character. We have specified that it be a firmly entrenched form, for he who spends of his wealth rarely, and for a specific need of his, cannot be called generous unless this quality is firmly established within him. And we have further stipulated that actions proceed from him with ease and without deliberation because he who spends of his wealth or remains silent during anger only after some effort and deliberation, it cannot be said of him that he possesses a generous or patient character.

So, there are four matters to consider: first, a beautiful or repugnant action; second, the ability to perform them; third, knowledge of them; fourth, an entity in the soul which inclines a person to either excellence or repugnance, and facilitates that for him.

Clearly, character does not refer to actions, because perhaps a person is of a generous character but cannot spend either due to a lack of money or some other hindrance, or alternatively perhaps he is of a miserly character, and though he spends he only does so for a reason or to show off.
Nor does it refer to the ability or power to perform such actions. This is because power is connected to both giving and withholding, and every person is born with the capacity to give and withhold, but that doesn’t mean that they are either generous or miserly in character.
Nor does it refer to knowledge, for knowledge is connected to all beautiful and repugnant things in the same manner.

As such, it refers to the fourth, i.e., the form in the soul through which the soul is equipped to give and withhold. Character, therefore, refers to this form.”

The concept of akhlaq in the Qur’an and sunna

The word akhlaq appears in the Qur’an in the verse that says of the Prophet “Indeed, you are of lofty character” (al-Qalam: 4). As well, it appears in numerous hadiths affirming the necessity and importance of ethics in Islam. An example is the hadith: “The most beloved of you to Allah is the best of you in character,”

There is also the hadith, “The best of you are the best in character.” And on the authority of Abu Tha’laba al-Khushani, that the Prophet said, “The most beloved to me, and the nearest to me, are those of you who are the best in character. And the most detested to me, and the farthest from me, are those who are of the worst character: those who chatter among themselves, are braggarts, and are long-winded.”

On the authority of Abu Salih who said that Abu Hurayra said that the Prophet said, “I have been sent down only to complete the best of manners.” To “complete” here means to add to something already present. As such, this saying of the Prophet directs us to the fact that ethics are shared between people. For this reason, he also said, “The best of you in the period of jahiliyya (pre Islamic era) are the best of you in Islam if you come to understand.”

The Prophet would smile at the mention of Ibn Jud’an, so A’isha asked the Prophet, “O Prophet of Allah, during the period of jahiliyya, Ibn Jud’an would keep good relations with his family and feed the poor. Is that to his benefit?” The Prophet said, “It does not benefit, for he never once said, ‘My Lord, forgive me my sins on the Day of Judgement.’” Through this, the Prophet points us to the fact that ethics were already present, and it is incumbent on us to respect them even when they emanate from those who are not sincere. They have a strong impact on creation, that was understood and regarded by the Prophet himself.

The issue of ethics are therefore fundamental to the make-up of mankind, regardless of whether or not it is accompanied by faith. The Prophet (peace be upon him) urged us towards these values. This is why we find in the famous hadith of Gabriel that, “A man came forward [towards the Prophet] and sat at his knees, and asked, ‘O Prophet of God, what is Islam?’ He responded, ‘That you not associate anything with God; that you establish prayer; that you give the zakat; and that you fast in Ramadan.’ He said, ‘You have spoken the truth. O Prophet of God, what is faith (iman)?’ The Prophet responded, ‘That you believe in God, His angels, His scriptures, the meeting with Him, His Prophets, the resurrection [on the Day of Judgement], and fate.’ He said, ‘You have spoken the truth. O Prophet of God, What is excellence (ihsan)?’ He responded, ‘That you fear Allah as if you see Him. For if you do not see Him, He sees you.’ He said, ‘You have spoken the truth.’ ... The Prophet later said, ‘That was Gabriel. He wanted to teach you when you don’t ask yourselves.’”

When asked about Islam and faith, the Prophet spoke of their constituent parts respectively. However, when asked about ihsan, he spoke with respect to ethics. Based upon this, Muslims divided their disciplines of learning. They made fiqh the science of Islam, while aqida studies matters of faith, and Sufism studies excellence (ihsan).

But, did the scholars put forth principles of ethics? Or are they many and not amenable to being set out in precise terms the way Islam and faith are? The understanding of akhlaq in Islam is taken from the understanding of God’s beautiful names. Allah has described himself in the Qur’an by 152 different qualities, and the Prophet (peace be upon him) described Him in a hadith by 164 qualities. After discarding repetitions, we arrive at a number of 220 qualities. Thereafter, in a hadith on the authority of Abu Hurayra, the Prophet said, “Allah has 99 names – a hundred less one. Whosoever exhausts them, Allah admits him into Paradise.” This hadith comes in 3 different versions, each of which differs by 34 names, which is how we arrive at the 164 that the Prophet used to describe Allah the Exalted.

By, “he who exhausts him” is meant “he who shapes himself after them”
The beautiful names of God may indicate:

1. His Beauty, such as “The Compassionate” or “The Merciful”
2. His Perfection, such as “The Creator” or “The Originator”
3. His Glory, such as “The Vengeful” or “The Proud”. This category is not to be used as models, for they are the sole prerogative of God.

A hadith related by ‘Abdullah b. Mas’ud indicates that there are Names and Qualities of God we do not know about. He related that the Prophet would invoke Allah using the following words “O Allah, I am Your servant, son of Your servant and of your female-servant. My forelock is in Your Hand. Your Judgement with regards to me is Just. I ask You by every name of Yours, either that You have named yourself, or revealed to us in your Book, or taught one of your creation, or kept solely in Your Knowledge, that you make the Qur’an the spring of my heart, the light of my eyes, the solace for my sadness, and the solution to my worries.”

Categories of Ethics

Ethics can be divided into two categories:

1. Theoretical ethics: This refers to a specific genre made up of the principles of conduct (suluk). It consists of fundamental principles and general rules extracted from them. A person is able to follow them in all sorts of places and different eras.
2. Practical ethics: This refers to the set of principles of conduct, through regard for which a person is able to reach his ultimate goal, and attain all happiness and goodness.

Ethics are an indispensable part of life which depict for us the good life and the means to it, and aid us in arriving at a balance between private individual demands and the necessities of life in a society.

Ethics between Man and Society

The wisdom of God in creating man is that he made the individual unable to fulfill the requirements of his life by himself, and similarly unable to build the earth without cooperation and harmonious living with others. This is what is meant by the philosophers and intellectuals by their repeated invocation of the saying, “Man is by nature a social being.” In order for man to have natural resources, the principles of proper conduct must guide his behavior. In all of his conduct, he must base himself on laws of social ethics, and take regard of others in every matter he undertakes.

If matters proceed in this manner, social membership will belong to individuals, and virtue will be realized, especially if every member of a society is placed in a place that is appropriate to him and his capabilities. In contrast, if chaos takes over, and there is an absence of ethics specifying how people ought to deal with themselves and with others, corruption will enter into the society and eventually lead it to collapse.

Based upon these givens, and the mercy of God towards mankind who are His representatives on earth, Allah has sent prophets and messengers in order to spread guidance and values springing from the religion. The last of these is Islam, about the bearer of whose message, the Prophet (peace be upon him), God said, “You are of the highest of character” (al-Qalam: 4).
Ethics in Islam thus refer to principles and fundamentals ordered for human behaviour, and specified by revelation, to organize the life of man in a manner that allows him to realize the purpose of creation in this world in a complete and perfect manner.

This Islamic system of ethics is distinguished by two features. The first is its divine character, that is the Will of God; and the second is its human character, that is there is an effort and role for specifying this system from the practical direction.

It is a system which is complete only when the theoretical and practical meet. It is not simply a part of the general Islamic system. Rather, it is the very essence of Islam, its spirit, in force in all domains. That is to say, the Islamic system in general is based on the philosophy of ethics at its most fundamental. Rather, ethics are the very essence of the divine messages.
“Ethics are necessary for the continuation and cohesiveness of social life, and they contribute towards the progress and flourishing of civilization. Islamic ethics are distinctive in that they perfect the process of building sociality by fixing human relationships on the basis of belief and sincerity. They also push towards perfection in the fields of work, crafts and knowledge. Each of these is necessary for a truly happy human life.”

Indeed, throughout his whole life, a man may never feel the need for certain matters of knowledge. It may never occur to him. However, we will never be able to put aside his concerns for ethical matters, even for an instant. This is because humanity is always in need of fundamental principles in order to order his relationships with God and with the rest of creation.

The superiority of Islamic ethics

There is no doubt that reason is one of the most important faculties of knowledge, and that the senses are a means to it. However, these are insufficient in and of themselves to distinguish completely and correctly between the good and the evil, the beautiful and the repulsive. This is due to a number of reasons.

The first is the limitations of the mind. There are some matters that are difficult for the mind to grasp. Instead, people resort to speculating and guessing, and knowledge of these matters grows progressively due to experience. But it is not properly known from the first instant.

The second is the limitations of the senses. These are the mind’s means for grasping things, but are open to error. The third is the difference in people’s capacities for reasoning and arriving at the truth of things. For, some minds judge a thing to be beautiful, while others judge it to be repulsive. Indeed, it is possible for a thing to be thought of as repulsive among many people, though it is not in reality, and vice versa. To further the point, it is even possible for one’s judgement of a thing to change.

Secular ethics, which specify their standards to be different theories and philosophies, remain relativistic – relative to the claims or rebuttals of individuals. The solution is to resort to principles of character derived from religion. For religion, “in that it comprises beliefs and principles, commands and prohibitions, desires and values, lofty examples and general principles for behaviour, certainly plays an important role in the lives of believers. It is a central source for ethical obligation. That which distinguishes ethical principles extended from religion, on the one hand, from those taken from the individual and society, one the other, is: their generality, humanity, sacredness, everlastingness and permanency over generations. Their sacredness is a result of their divine source, that is revelation from God.”

So, the Qur’an in this matter preserves and continues that which preceded it and may be distinguished by its wide orbit which includes the essence of ethics. This is what had become separated apart in the teachings of the clergy and the philosophers, both deontologists and utilitarians. They were far apart from each other both in terms of time and place, and perhaps some of them left no trace behind so that their teachings may be preserved. It may be said that this is the greatest characteristic of the Qur’an, if not the most valuable characteristic altogether.

The purity and steadfastness of this ethical teaching becomes apparent through its forms; the methods it takes to present its lessons, different from those of previous teachings; its unified structure which does not admit of any inconsistency; and its manner of dealing with differences and variety within the framework of complete harmony. This is because it began to disagree with previous laws whenever they took to excess, and re-established equilibrium where they would tend towards one side or the other, and directed towards a singular goal, infusing it with a unified spirit, such that the truth become to be attributed to it in all morals and ethics.

Among the greatest characteristics of this teaching was the innovation. It is not satisfactory, in reality, to say with regards to the ethics of the Qur’an that we have preserved the heritage of our forebears and support. Rather, when confronted with different opinions, we must add that Qur’anic ethics supply these opinions with a sacred basis.

How was the Qur’an able to have such a miraculous impact? Its style was extremely simple, in that it chose to express its principles with particularly impactful language – language that is always located halfway between the abstract and ambiguous, on the one hand, and the empirical and formalistic, on the other hand.

From the perspective of clarity of content, we find that the clarity of each principle impedes chaos and following one’s whims. However, at the same time, the lack of specificity of the content leaves to each individual the freedom to choose the form of speech that is the best example, in accordance with his experience. Similarly, he is able to choose between the form that is best suited to a pressing need and other ethical demands. So, there are two issues: formation and compatibility. It is necessary, through careful effort, to distance oneself from excessive laxity and exaggeration.
This is how the Qur’anic shari’a was able to accomplish such perfection, unlike any other text, in realizing harmony between two seemingly opposite sides: kindness in resoluteness, advancement in steadfastness, and diversity in unity.

Ethical obligation

Obligation is a fundamental concern of any ethical school, for if there is no obligation, there cannot be responsibility toward any ethical system or law. But what is the source of this ethical obligation? Is it the human conscience, as some philosophers say? Or social pressure as others say? Or is it reason?
Scholars have spoken of these three sources at length, in particular with respect to their relativity and their limitations. The reality is that it is impossible for either individual conscience or reason or a given society to set up ethical laws and demand their imposition on all consciences, minds and societies.

Despite the efforts of those who mock the values, as well as those who are blindly devoted to ethics, to say that there is no firm standard by which to specify what is good or bad, and that the matter is relative to particular societies, we may respond by saying that what they claim is a form of the philosophies of corruption, and a dissolution of ethics, which has an extremely negative impact on societies and individuals.

It is therefore necessary to refer to a higher legislative authority to settle such disagreements, one that is capable of being comprehensive as well as applicable in every place and time, and to all people in general. This authority cannot be found except in the very Creator of existence, time, place, and people, He Who sees all and knows about all He creates. As the Qur’an informs us, “Should He not know,- He that created? and He is the One that understands the finest mysteries (and) is well-acquainted (with them)” (al-Mulk: 14).

So the source of ethical obligation in Islam is the divine commands of which Allah informs us in the Holy Qur’an and through the Prophet (peace be upon him).

However, the Qur’an takes great care to link every teaching and ruling of the shari’a with the ethical value that forms its basis. So, for example, when it invites us to make every effort towards reconciliation amongst our families, even when it is not in our interests, Allah supports His call by saying “And reconciliation is better” (al-Nisa’: 128). Similarly, when the Qur’an invites us to engage in commerce by weighing fairly, He says, “Give full measure when ye measure, and weigh with a balance that is straight: that is the most fitting and the most advantageous in the final determination.” (al-Isra: 35). Also, when he sets out the principles of modesty which demand from men that they lower their gazes in the presence of women and guard themselves from impropriety, He goes on to explain, “That is purer for them” (al-Nur: 30). And after He commands us to clarify the reasoning before promulgating a legal ruling, He explains that it is so “lest ye smite some folk in ignorance and afterward repent of what ye did.” (al-Hujurat: 6).

There are also numerous examples of the Qur’an guiding us towards spirituality and ethical values. These include the following verse: “Say: "Not equal are things that are bad and things that are good, even though the abundance of the bad may dazzle thee” (al-Ma’ida: 100); and “But the raiment of righteousness,- that is the best” (al-A’raf: 26); and “he to whom wisdom is granted receiveth indeed a benefit overflowing” (al-Baqara: 269). Indeed, the fundamental principle on which the shari’a is based is “Allah never commands what is shameful” (al-A’raf: 28); and “Allah commands justice and the doing of good” (al-Nahl: 90).

Therefore, the primary source of obligation in Islam is the divine revelation as found in the Qur’an and sunna. After that, there are other things that the shari’a takes account of, such as the societal responsibility to protect these ethics and morals. This is why Allah has commanded us to “command the good, and forbid the evil.” As well, the shari’a takes account of reason and human conscience (or the senses) in specifying the good and the evil. This is the reason that the wisdoms behind rulings, as well as ethical commands, were related in the Qur’an

Features of ethical obligation

1. Action must be something one is capable of doing
Allah says, “On no soul doth Allah Place a burden greater than it can bear.” (al-Baqara: 286); “Allah puts no burden on any person beyond what He has given him.” (al-Talaq:7); “So fear Allah as much as ye can” (al-Taghabun: 16). In terms of ethical obligation slam takes account of human capability, and does not entrust them with anything beyond their capacity. As such, obligation is conditional on the capacity of the legal agent.

2. Ease and lifting difficulty
The second feature of ethical obligation is the consideration of ease and avoiding difficulty. For Islamic ethics are not only in keeping with the capacities and capabilities of people; they are in fact meant to be easier than even that. As Allah says, “Allah intends every facility for you; He does not want to put to difficulties.” (al-Baqara: 185); and “Allah doth not wish to place you in a difficulty” (al-Ma’ida: 6). And it is related by Abu Hurayra that the Prophet said, “You were only sent to make things easy; you were not sent to make things difficult.”

Similarly, Islam has lightened the burden on legal agents who find some of the rulings difficult. This may take the form of complete leniency, or partial leniency. Sometimes, it means permission to delay an action until when is capable of doing it, and sometimes it means outright replacing it with another, less cumbersome, action. This is from the Mercy of God, and His Compassion towards them.

3. The different ranks of rulings
Islam has ordered ethical responsibilities in a particular manner. The most obligatory is the individual obligation, then the communal obligation, then the mandatory, then the emphasized sunna, then the non-emphasized sunna, then the supererogatory, and finally the extra perfections.
Similarly, it has ordered the prohibitions, or evils, into: the major sins, the minor sins, the disliked, and that which it is preferred to avoid.

From another perspective, Islam divides obligations into specific and non-specific, and temporary and permanent. It has also set out a space between the good and evil, though it is neither: this is the permissible, one side of which borders the good, and the other side of which borders the evil. And he has commanded people to orient themselves towards the good and keep away from the evil.

Two important matters follow from this discussion of ethical obligation: ethical responsibility, and desert.

1. Ethical responsibility: Ethical responsibility means that a person assumes the burden of the outcome of the actions he commits to, or agrees to, or chooses, whether these actions are positive or negative.
God has made responsibility conditional upon the acceptance of a trust, as related in the Qur’an: “Lo! We offered the trust unto the heavens and the earth and the hills, but they shrank from bearing it and were afraid of it. And man assumed it. Lo! he hath proved a tyrant and a fool.” (al-Ahzab: 72). So the Qur’an connects human responsibility on the freedom to choose. So, the one who is compelled or forced does not bear responsibility for that which he is forced to do. For this reason, human responsibility does not go beyond the realm of an agent’s freedom.

One of the most beautiful parables in the Qur’an demonstrates this, i.e., the comparison between he who is deprived of the freedom to choose and the servants of God whom He has made free. “Allah sets forth the Parable (of two men: one) a slave under the dominion of another; He has no power of any sort; and (the other) a man on whom We have bestowed goodly favours from Ourselves, and he spends thereof (freely), privately and publicly: are the two equal? (By no means;) praise be to Allah. But most of them understand not. Allah sets forth (another) Parable of two men: one of them dumb, with no power of any sort; a wearisome burden is he to his master; whichever way be directs him, he brings no good: is such a man equal with one who commands Justice, and is on a Straight Way?” (al-Nahl: 75-76).

He then follows this up by saying, “It is He Who brought you forth from the wombs of your mothers when ye knew nothing; and He gave you hearing and sight and intelligence and affections: that ye may give thanks (to Allah)” (al-Nahl: 78), in order to emphasize that man is given awareness so that he is able to be a free and responsible person with reason and will. As Ghazali said, “He is a messenger from the interior, and the Prophets are also messengers from the exterior.” And so, if a person’s freedom diminishes, his ethical responsibility diminishes in equal measure.

The noble shari’a has affirmed personal responsibility based on Qur’anic texts. This constitutes a challenge to previous regimes which partook in collective punishment. Among these Qur’anic texts are clear verses which establish individual responsibilities, and consist of a unity of thought which begins with the act of knowing, includes civic responsibilities, and ends with ethical responsibility.

Among the verses that set out the act of knowing as a personal responsibilities are: “ Each soul earneth only on its own account, nor doth any laden bear another's load.” (al-An’am: 164); and “if any will see, it will be for (the good of) his own soul; if any will be blind, it will be to his own (harm)” (al-An’am: 104). The first verse is a clear reference to the acquisition of ethical values, and the second to the acquisition of knowledge. The word used for seeing, ibsar, connotes also knowledge and behavior, and the word for being blind, ‘ama, means being ignorant of the primordial truths, like knowledge of God, His angels, books, and prophets; and behavior in accordance with that knowledge.

So, the Qur’an has ordered things such that the act of knowing comes first. Believing in Islam is itself a sort of knowledge, followed by action. And so, some jurists have included knowledge as a stage of legal obligation.
As for the verses that impose metaphysical responsibility on the individual, these are many. They include, “So on that Day no power shall they have over each other, for profit or harm: and We shall say to the wrong-doers, "Taste ye the Penalty of the Fire,- the which ye were wont to deny!” (al-Saba: 42). In modern social science, this is known as an individual undertaking to set out his behaviour in accordance with his conscience. This does not negate responsibility in the life of this world, even though the true and superior responsibility is that which pertains to the next life.

2. Ethical Desert: Ethical desert is a natural consequence of ethical responsibility. It is necessary for the maintenance of justice among people. If there is desert for every ethical behavior, there will be a commitment to ethics and virtue.

There are many types of desert:

i. Divine: As Allah says, “That man can have nothing but what he strives for; That (the fruit of) his striving will soon come in sight: Then will he be rewarded with a reward complete.” (al-Najm: 39-41); and “That Day will every soul be requited for what it earned; no injustice will there be that Day, for Allah is Swift in taking account. ” (al-Ghafir: 17)
ii. Psychological, sentimental, or mental: This is the pain and stress felt by he who acts in an evil manner. As Allah says, “But he who turneth away from remembrance of Me, his will be a narrow life” (Ta ha: 124). This feeling is from the sentiments or conscience which censure a person for the sins he has committed.

iii. Legal: This is the punishment administered to the person of poor character. In Islam, the penal system consists of two types of punishments
The hudud: These are clearly specified in the shari’a, such as the amputation of the hand of a thief
The discretionary punishments: These are left to the judicial system to decide upon.
iv. Social censure: This is the lack of trust in a corrupt or evil person that results from his behaviour and character. As a result of this, his testimony is not accepted, and he often fails to find respect or acceptance among people. This is of course extremely difficult on the human soul.

The comprehensiveness of ethics in Islam

The feature of comprehensiveness becomes readily and undoubtedly apparent in the ethics of the Qur’an. This is not only because the commands of the Qur’an are directed towards humanity as a whole, such as the sayings of Allah, “Say: ‘O men! I am sent unto you all, as the Messenger of Allah’” (al-A’raf: 158) and “Blessed is He who sent down the criterion to His servant, that it may be an admonition to all creatures” (al-Furqan: 1).”

Rather, the principle of justice, or public virtue, must be applied by every individual in a consistent manner, no matter whether it is applied upon oneself or upon others. As the Qur’an says, “Do ye enjoin right conduct on the people, and forget (To practise it) yourselves” (al-Baqara: 44); and “do not even aim at getting anything which is bad, in order that out of it ye may give away something, when ye yourselves would not receive it except with closed eyes” (al-Baqara: 267); and “Woe to those that deal in fraud,- Those who, when they have to receive by measure from men, exact full measure, But when they have to give by measure or weight to men, give less than due. ” (al-Mutaffifin: 1-3).

Similarly there is no regard for whether it is applied upon one’s close relatives or others; or upon the rich or the poor: “O ye who believe! stand out firmly for justice, as witnesses to Allah, even as against yourselves, or your parents, or your kin, and whether it be (against) rich or poor” (al-Nisa’: 135).

Nor is there any regard for those who are outside of a particular group or within it: “And among them there is he who, if thou trust him with a piece of gold, will not return it to thee unless thou keep standing over him. That is because they say: We have no duty to the Gentiles. They speak a lie concerning Allah knowingly. Nay, but (the chosen of Allah is) he who fulfilleth his pledge and wardeth off (evil); for lo! Allah loveth those who ward off (evil).” (Aal Imran: 75-76).

Nor is there any regard for discriminating between friends or enemies: “And let not the hatred of others to you make you swerve to wrong and depart from justice. Be just: that is next to piety” (al-Ma’ida: 8).

Islamic ethics do not leave out any portion of human life, be it spiritual or material, religious or worldly, rational or sentimental, individual or communal. In all cases, there is an exemplary framework for sublime behaviour. What ethicists have routinely divided up into religion, philosophy, custom and society all come together in the ethical system of Islam in an orderly, complete and perfect manner.

1. There is that which is concerned with the individual from different perspectives:
i. Physically speaking, the body has needs and necessities. Allah addresses this by saying, “Eeat and drink: But waste not by excess, for Allah loveth not the wasters.” (al-A’raf: 31). And the Prophet (peace be upon him) has said, “Your body has a right over you.”
ii. Rationally, the individual has talents and horizons. The Qur’an says: “Say: "Behold all that is in the heavens and on earth"; but neither Signs nor Warners profit those who believe not.” (Yunus: 101); and “Say: ‘I do admonish you on one point: that ye do stand up before Allah,- (It may be) in pairs, or (it may be) singly,- and reflect (within yourselves): your Companion is not possessed: he is no less than a warner to you, in face of a terrible Penalty.’” (Saba’: 46).
iii. Spiritually, there are passions, desires and impulses. The Qur’an says, “Truly, he succeeds that purifies it, And he fails that corrupts it!” (al-Shams: 9-10).

2. There is that which is concerned with the family from different perspectives:
i. The relationship between spouses: “Live with them on a footing of kindness and equity. If ye take a dislike to them it may be that ye dislike a thing, and Allah brings about through it a great deal of good.” (al-Nisa’: 19)
ii. The relationship between relatives and intimates: “Allah commands justice, the doing of good, and liberality to kith and kin” (al-Nahl: 90).
3. There is that which is concerned with society from different perspectives:

i. In terms of manners, etiquette and protocol: “O ye who believe! enter not houses other than your own, until ye have asked permission and saluted those in them: that is best for you, in order that ye may heed (what is seemly).” (al-Nur: 27).
ii. In commercial transactions and legal matters: “lah doth command you to render back your Trusts to those to whom they are due; And when ye judge between man and man, that ye judge with justice” (al-Nisa’: 58).
We may go on and spell out all the fields taken up by the Islamic ethical system, and the path it sketches out to be followed in every minor and major matter of the lived reality of its adherents.

And so, the concept of ethics in Islam brings together all that had been divided by religious sects and philosophical schools, both realist and idealist, in terms of their way of looking at ethics and their explanation of the source of ethical obligation. Not all of what these groups say is false, nor is all of it true. The deficiency of each viewpoint is that they have looked at the subject from one perspective and neglected it from another perspective. This is unavoidable for human cognition, which is incapable of taking up an issue in a manner that encompasses all times and places, all types and personalities, all circumstances and perspectives. This comprehensive viewpoint requires an All-knowing and Wise God.

If we turn our attention to the Torah, for example, we find that it is concerned to set out fundamental principles for legislating behaviour: do not kill, do not steal, etc. We see that the leading consideration here is to specify rights, and to seek justice and equality. Then, if we turn to the New Testament, it sets out ethical principles in addition to affirming what had come before in the Torah and supplementing it. The most important features here are tolerance, mercy and good conduct. Finally, when we come to the shari’a of the Qur’an, we find an affirmation of both of these predecessors in a single consistent system: “Allah commands justice, and the doing of good” (al-Nahl: 90). In its manner of affirming both, the Qur’an grants to each its proper place in the balance of values.

“And the recompense of evil is punishment like it, but whoever forgives and amends, he shall have his reward from Allah; surely He does not love the unjust” (al-Shura: 40). Then, we also add to this new area, formulating etiquettes for interpersonal interaction, sketching out a framework for generous behaviour for lofty societies. This includes the etiquette of greetings, permissions, address, meetings, etc. These have been spelt out in detail in the Qur’anic chapters al-Nur and al-Mujadala.

The cultivation of morals

Man is capable of acquiring the characteristics and habits he is brought up with. Indeed, the importance and benefit of ethics are what make it capable of development and evolution, and open the way for education and training. For it is by continuous training and some amount of time that we are able to ground the ingredients of good character in the personality of an individual such that it becomes a habit and natural disposition.
There are a few matters that are necessary for the proper cultivation and refinement of ethics.

1. The company of the righteous: What trains a person best is the company of righteous people. Man is passionate for customs and fashions. Just as he follows those around him in clothing, for examples, he will follow those around him in deed, and model himself after their mannerisms and ethics. As the Prophet said, “A man is on the religion of his close friends, so look carefully whom you befriend.” Ibn Ata’ Allah says, “Do not spend time with he whose state does not invigorate you, and whose words do not guide you towards Allah. ... Instead, spend time with knowledgeable old people, who inspire you because their aspirations are connected to Allah. Do not resort to any but them, and do not entrust your affairs to any but then. Their words will point you towards Allah due to their knowledge of Him. Keeping the company of the righteous is a great step on the path towards Allah. And keeping company with the evil, it is extremely blameworthy due to the regression from high levels of piety that it entails.”

2. Struggling with the self: “And for such as had entertained the fear of standing before their Lord's (tribunal) and had restrained (their) soul from lower desires. Their abode will be the Garden.” (al-Nazi’at: 40-41). And it is related from the Prophet that he said to his companions, while returning from battle, “We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad.” They asked him, “What is the greater jihad, Messenger of Allah?” He said, “struggling against the self.” Al-Hasan used to say, “Your enemy is not he whom if you kill him, you are relieved of him. Rather, your enemy is your own self, between your two sides.” Dhun-Nun al-Misri once said, “Be only in a state of opposition with your soul, and at a distance from the devil.”

3. Expanding one’s horizons: If one’s circle of thinking is narrow, this leads quickly to lowly morals. He becomes like the person who sees no good except in himself, and sees none in creation deserving of goodness but him. The cure for this is to expand one’s horizons so that he may come to realize his true value to his society – that he is neither a vital organ of the body, nor the center around which everything else revolves. Rather, he is like all the others in his society merely a drop in the ocean. The truth is that narrow-mindedness is a source of numerous vices, to the point that it may lead one to consider oppression to be justice and vice versa. It is not possible for a person to rid himself of this prejudice until he loves the truth more than his own opinion and his own community, and he is enamoured with the idea of setting out to search for the truth. If this thinking expands, and he arrives at a correct judgement and follows it, his morals too will advance.

4. Studying the lives of the righteous: This is because their lives will appear in front of the reader, and inspire him to follow them. No community or nation is devoid of such righteous people. And no one can read about their life stories without feeling a new spirit enter him, impelling him to the best of deeds. Much of what has pushed people to great actions and feats has been the stories they have read of great people, or stories of events related to them. We may add to these, parables and wisdom tales, for these have deep meanings which are efficacious for the soul, and dwell deeply in the mind.

One of the best things that has been said about this is from al-Ghazali:
“Know that some people who have taken to excessive idleness have found it burdensome to struggle against the self, and discipline it, and involve themselves in purifying the soul and cultivating good morals. And so, they do not allow themselves to advance due to their incapacity and deficiencies. So they claim that character is incapable of change.
They argue this in two ways. First, they say that character is the interior form just as one’s body is the exterior form. The latter is not capable of change, for the short person is incapable of making himself tall, and the tall person is not capable of making himself short. Nor can the ugly person make himself beautiful. And so, similarly, for the person who is spiritually repulsive, or evil.

Secondly, they say that good character curbs lewd desires and anger. We have experienced this through struggling against the soul, and we know that these are in fact a result of one’s temperament and disposition and so cannot be separated from a person. Involving oneself in such a struggle is simply futile, and a waste of time, for what is desired is itself impossible.
We say that if morals are not capable of change, there would be no point to the many advices and admonitions, such as the Prophet’s express command, “Beautify your morals.” How can this be denied to people while we admit it as a possibility for animals. Both falcons and dogs may be domesticated. And a recalcitrant horse may be made obedient. These are all examples of changes in character.

Beautiful morals are indeed open doors from the heart to paradise and closeness to the All-Merciful. And poor morals are diseases of the heart, and poisons for the soul. This is a disease that forfeits the eternal life of the hereafter, and not simply the bodily life of this world. Doctors stress the setting down of principles for curing bodies, and since the life of the hereafter is more precious to the believer, there should be even more care to setting down the principles for curing the diseases of the soul. This sort of healing must be learned and practiced by all people of understanding.

http://www.ali-gomaa.com/?page=scholary-output&so_details=140#.UWP_dVwtijo

---

Note:
If you wish to send me a “private” message, please click here Facebook.

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Politics and Islaam: An Unholy Mix?

Click here to LIKE this Blog on Face book.
---

Islam and Politics: An Unholy Mix?

Jasser Auda

The relationship between 'Islam' and politics is not a simple relationship that could be explained in one statement such as either statement mentioned in your question. So, 'Islam cannot mix with politics' is not an accurate statement. Nor is 'political matters cannot be dissociated from Islam' an accurate statement either.

Let us start by defining what we mean by 'Islam' when we talk about politics. In the area of politics, 'Islam' could only mean general guidelines and principles, rather than specific rules and detailed fatwas about specific political matters.

In other words, the part of Islam that deals with the ever-changing area of politics is the part that is about its fixed universal values and principles, and not the part that is about its details and instructions.

For example, when it comes to political participation, the Quranic verses that apply here are the verses that talked about shura (consultation), which is a general and guiding principle. The mechanism of how this consultation should take place is meant, in Islam, to be changeable and to be left for people to define according to their own time and circumstances.

Thus, if the Prophet (peace be upon him) had consulted his companions in a direct and oral way (as narrated about the battles of Badr and Uhud, for example), this does not mean that 'Islam' prefers or encourages some sort of 'direct democracy' over other types of polling systems or political systems.

Any type of democracy, or even a different political theory or system, is approved in Islam only as long as it is compatible with the principles of consultation, justice, equality of human beings, and the other Islamic principles and values.

For another example, the issue of wars (or jihad al-qital) is also a political issue that should only be based on the general guidelines of Islam and cannot have one and only rule for every place and time.

In this area, what is required is to balance two objectives (maqasid): (1) to promote and protect peaceful co-existence, which is one of Islam's higher principles, and (2) to promote and protect Muslims' lives and wellbeing, which is also one of Islam's higher principles.

The default and ideal situation in Islam is peace and peaceful co-existence, and directing the Muslim struggle (jihad) to bettering themselves and improving their morals and spirituality (jihad al-nafs), thus giving a chance for (1) and (2) to be fulfilled together.

This is proven by numerous traditions of the Prophet. One such tradition is 'The Scroll of Madinah' (Sahifat Al-Madinah), in which the Prophet and the Jews of Madinah wrote a 'covenant' that defined the relationship between Muslims and Jews living in Madinah. The scroll stated that, "Muslims and Jews are one nation (ummah), with Muslims having their own religion and Jews having their own religion." (Refer, for example, to: Burhan Zuraiq, Al-Sahifah: Mithaq Al-Rasoul, 1st ed., Damascus: Dar al-Numair 1996, p. 353).

However, if that peaceful co-existence is betrayed by others and Muslims are 'killed and driven out of their homes,' as the other verses say, then fighting is sanctioned in order to protect Muslims' lives.

The problem with many of these militant groups that you mentioned is that they misinterpret the verses of the Quran to mean one choice for all time: war! They, surprisingly, forget about the higher objectives of prosperity and cooperation of human beings.

For example, the verse, which has come to be named 'The Verse of the Sword' (ayat al-saif), according to some scholars, states:

(But when the forbidden months are past, then slay the pagans wherever you find them, and seize them.) (At-Tawbah 9:5)

The historical context of the verse, in the ninth year of Hijrah, is that of a war between Muslims and the pagans of Makkah. The thematic context of the verse in chapter nine is also the context of the same war, which the Chapter is addressing.

However, the verse was taken out of its thematic and historical contexts and claimed to have defined the ruling between Muslims and non-Muslims in every place, time, and circumstance. Hence, it was perceived to be in disagreement with more than two hundred other verses of the Quran, all calling for dialogue, freedom of belief, forgiveness, peace, and even patience.

Conciliation between these different evidences, somehow, was not an option. To solve the disagreement, based on the method of abrogation, some exegetes concluded that this verse (9:5), which was revealed towards the end of the Prophet's life, abrogated each and every verse that was revealed before it.

Therefore, the following verses were considered abrogated: 'no compulsion in the religion;' (Al-Baqarah 2:256) 'forgive them, for God loves those who do good to people;' (Al-An`am 6:13) 'repel evil with that which is best;(Al-Mu'minun 23:96) ' 'so patiently persevere;' (Ar-Rum 30:60) 'do not argue with the People of the Book except with means that are best;' (Fussilat 41:46) and '(say:) You have your religion and I have my religion.' (Al-Kafirun 109:6)

In addition, a large number of prophetic traditions that legitimize peace treaties and multi-cultural co-existence, to use contemporary terms, were also abrogated.

What we need in today's world, other than cases of self-defense of course, is to spread a culture of mutual co-existence and multi-faith dialogue and cooperation.

This is what Muslims need to give priority to in your country and other countries where Muslims and non-Muslims have co-existed peacefully for centuries.

http://www.onislam.net/english/ask-about-islam/islam-and-the-world/politics-and-economics/167426-islam-aamp-politics-an-unholy-mix.html

---

Note:
If you wish to send me a “private” message, please click here Facebook.